Geophysical detection of hydrothermal alteration footprints

Presented at AEGC2018 by John McGaughey, President, Mira Geoscience

The use of geophysical data is appealing when exploring deep or under cover because, although it does not directly respond to rock chemistry, it often provides uniform areal data coverage. In deep and undercover exploration contexts, direct recognition of footprint-scale hydrothermal alteration from geophysical data is the ultimate goal of geophysical interpretation—there cannot be any expectation of a direct ore deposit signature in exploration data, and understanding footprint-scale alteration signatures can lead directly to targets.

The key to geophysical recognition of alteration at the ore system scale is the assumption, typically met in practice, that the primary control on physical property variation across the system is formational and structural, with hydrothermal alteration a contributing secondary effect. Specialized interpretation workflows, such as described in the article above, can take advantage of this assumption to create physical property models composed of primary (formational and structural) and secondary (alteration) physical property signatures that are fully consistent with geophysical data and whatever level of geological data is available. The secondary physical property signatures are, in many cases, directly interpretable in terms of hydrothermal alteration domains.

3D geological model.

Magnetic data.

Case study: The Mutooroo Iron Project area, Australia

This is a great example of developing a geologically-based magnetic model using a variety of interpretation, modelling, and inversion techniques. Due to limited constraining data on the magnetic units, construction of the starting model was based predominantly on interpretation of magnetic data. In this instance, the goal was to first develop a geologically plausible 3D representation of homogeneous magnetic domains beneath non-magnetic cover that explains the majority of the measured magnetic response. This was supported by the sparse geological data and magnetic susceptibility provided by drilling under cover. The robustness of the magnetic domains are validated by assigning a homogeneous susceptibility to each domain, forward modelling, and observing a good correlation between the predicted and measured magnetic data. A final stage of inversion to solve for local susceptibility variations within the domains highlights magnetic anomalies that may be associated with alteration and therefore become potential targets or areas of geological complexity that require further investigation. This geologically-based model, consistent with geological constraints and geophysical survey data, provides a basis for confident decision making in technical and business realms, with the ability to adapt and accommodate new and evolving information as it becomes available.

Glenn Pears – Principal Geophysicist with Mira Geoscience

Glenn joined our team a little over 15 years ago! Glenn worked closely in the above project with his colleague James Alderman. Glenn is a highly experienced geophysicist providing expertise in data integration and interpretation projects. His strengths are in geologically-constrained geophysical interpretation and inversion using GOCAD Mining Suite, data assessment, QA/QC and executing integrated interpretations.

Latest news

Software tips
June, 15 2020

Editing file settings

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR version 3.4, users will be able to edit their files’ settings...
Read more
Software tips
January, 05 2021

Copying drillholes in a grid pattern

In Geoscience ANALYST you can copy an existing drillhole’s collar and deviation in a grid pattern to map a mineralized horizon...
Read more
Software tips
October, 19 2020

Viewing data from report items

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR table and chart items from ad-hoc or scheduled reports can be easily refreshed, using the same filters that were applied in the original report, to display current data.
Read more
Virtual Lecture – Archive
June, 10 2020

What’s new in v.3.1 Geoscience ANALYST

Past event, view here or via our YouTube channel...
Read more
Software tips
December, 14 2020

Tagging query results

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, this allows you to rapidly access that subset of objects. Instead of having to search and select multiple filters every time...
Read more
Software tips
January, 25 2021

Display multiple Voxet sections

In GOCAD Mining Suite, you can create additional sections, hide/show them, use the slider and arrow to position them along the Voxet, and delete them...
Read more
Software tips
January, 03 2019

Customizing metadata

Version 3.0 of Geoscience INTEGRATOR has a new layout for data set summaries that allows you to document any general information as custom...
Read more
December, 07 2020

Footprints project public data repository available soon

Project-generated and previously public data, models, and documents from the NSERC-CMIC mineral exploration project, “Integrated Multi-Parameter Footprints of Ore Systems...
Read more
Case studies
February, 04 2019

Darlot Gold Mine Area, Australia

3D Interpretation of geological, 3D seismic, and conventional geophysical data for brownfields exploration targeting...
Read more
Software releases
December, 06 2019

Geoscience INTEGRATOR v3.2

New features were made in the web UI for better visualization of the mine model fusion data. Other features include…
Read more
Software releases
July, 27 2020

Geoscience INTEGRATOR v3.4

This version features various improvements to visualization and filtering in the mine model compilation, such as sharper...
Read more
Developer’s sandbox
May, 28 2020

Using Python with Geoscience ANALYST

A new Geoscience ANALYST Python API, providing the capability of connecting to open source software, is scheduled for release....
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services