Geophysical detection of hydrothermal alteration footprints

Presented at AEGC2018 by John McGaughey, President, Mira Geoscience

The use of geophysical data is appealing when exploring deep or under cover because, although it does not directly respond to rock chemistry, it often provides uniform areal data coverage. In deep and undercover exploration contexts, direct recognition of footprint-scale hydrothermal alteration from geophysical data is the ultimate goal of geophysical interpretation—there cannot be any expectation of a direct ore deposit signature in exploration data, and understanding footprint-scale alteration signatures can lead directly to targets.

The key to geophysical recognition of alteration at the ore system scale is the assumption, typically met in practice, that the primary control on physical property variation across the system is formational and structural, with hydrothermal alteration a contributing secondary effect. Specialized interpretation workflows, such as described in the article above, can take advantage of this assumption to create physical property models composed of primary (formational and structural) and secondary (alteration) physical property signatures that are fully consistent with geophysical data and whatever level of geological data is available. The secondary physical property signatures are, in many cases, directly interpretable in terms of hydrothermal alteration domains.

3D geological model.

Magnetic data.

Case study: The Mutooroo Iron Project area, Australia

This is a great example of developing a geologically-based magnetic model using a variety of interpretation, modelling, and inversion techniques. Due to limited constraining data on the magnetic units, construction of the starting model was based predominantly on interpretation of magnetic data. In this instance, the goal was to first develop a geologically plausible 3D representation of homogeneous magnetic domains beneath non-magnetic cover that explains the majority of the measured magnetic response. This was supported by the sparse geological data and magnetic susceptibility provided by drilling under cover. The robustness of the magnetic domains are validated by assigning a homogeneous susceptibility to each domain, forward modelling, and observing a good correlation between the predicted and measured magnetic data. A final stage of inversion to solve for local susceptibility variations within the domains highlights magnetic anomalies that may be associated with alteration and therefore become potential targets or areas of geological complexity that require further investigation. This geologically-based model, consistent with geological constraints and geophysical survey data, provides a basis for confident decision making in technical and business realms, with the ability to adapt and accommodate new and evolving information as it becomes available.

Glenn Pears – Principal Geophysicist with Mira Geoscience

Glenn joined our team a little over 15 years ago! Glenn worked closely in the above project with his colleague James Alderman. Glenn is a highly experienced geophysicist providing expertise in data integration and interpretation projects. His strengths are in geologically-constrained geophysical interpretation and inversion using GOCAD Mining Suite, data assessment, QA/QC and executing integrated interpretations.

Latest news

Developer’s sandbox
June, 08 2020

Advanced drillhole planning and monitoring

We partnered with Groupe MISA to develop a low-cost 3D application where all elements of drillhole design and monitoring...
Read more
Software tips
February, 03 2020

Using search filters

In GOCAD Mining Suite, use filters to find objects efficiently.
Read more
Software tips
August, 10 2020

Importing and visualizing VP Geophysics models

In Geoscience ANALYST v3.1, VP Model objects can now be imported by a simple drag and drop! You can then visualize the model and,...
Read more
Case studies
March, 29 2015

Using predictive modelling in mineral exploration

We carried out targeting work for IOCG-style mineralisation in the Mt Dore area of QLD, Australia. We produced a 3D model and predictive exploration map...
Read more
Virtual Lecture – Archive
April, 22 2020

Constrained inversion using GRAV3D

Past event, view here or via our YouTube channel...
Read more
Software tips
March, 02 2019

2D map view

2D data can be viewed using the Panels menu > Add map view viewport. 3D data can be shown in the 2D view...
Read more
Case studies
May, 12 2020

BHP Bowen Basin, Australia

Surface electromagnetic and electrical methods were trialled at a mine in the Bowen Basin, Queensland, with the objective of mapping the extent of coked coal...
Read more
Case studies
April, 30 2019

ERO Copper Curaçá Valley, Brazil

Maximizing value: 3D data integration and interpretation. One of the main challenges in exploration is increasing our subsurface knowledge...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
February, 17 2020

Bridging the gap

Industry uptake of academic exploration and mining research is often slower than it should be. Academics must focus on innovation and education...
Read more
Software tips
January, 11 2021

Upload global descriptions

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, add an editable global description during import to save time and reduce errors...
Read more
Software tips
May, 18 2020

Data fusion – Automatic sample compilation

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, the Sample compilation page offers powerful tools to support the analysis of complex or difficult-to-view relationships within your sample data...
Read more
Software tips
May, 13 2021

Filtering samples by their drillhole

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, you can can filter them according to the drillhole they are located in...
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services