An interactive approach to forward modelling and inversion

Presented at Exploration17 by Glenn Pears, Principal Geophysicist, Mira Geoscience

Exploration is becoming harder, with greater focus at depth or under cover. Decisions must be made to eliminate ambiguity and maximize the benefits from various types of collected data. In terms of integrating geological and geophysical data, the essential goal is to interpret the available geophysical data based on a 3D geological model populated with physical properties. The key is to develop an understanding of the relationships between geology, geophysical responses, and rock properties. That information can then be used to create 3D geological domains with very little ancillary information, and often no drillhole data whatsoever.

Geologically-based forward modelling and inversion of geophysical data plays a vital role in quantifying these relationships, but it is important to emphasize that inversion is only one part of the interpretation process. Integrated interpretation requires an interactive approach to forward modelling and inversion. Therefore, the process demands a shift in mindset when it comes to geophysical inversion. Rather than inverting a geophysical data set once, forward modelling and inversion are performed according to the required geological hypotheses that need to be tested. Integrating geological and geophysical data, particularly in cases with limited subsurface control, also requires a practical, adaptive, and objective-driven approach to interpretation.

First geological model with anticline fold

Updated synclinal geological model.

Case study: Cave Rocks nickel and gold project area, Australia

This is a great example of producing an integrated 3D geological model based on existing geological mapping, very sparse exploration drilling, and airborne geophysical data. When tested against geophysics, the gravity, magnetics, and AEM data conflicted with the originally modelled geology. The objective was to first combine the modelled geological contact and structural surfaces, and overburden cover, in a 3D geological block model, attribute it with homogeneous properties, optimize it through inversion, and assess the computed gravity and magnetic responses. The first impression was that the correlation between the measured and calculated responses was reasonable, but areas existed where the geophysical data conflicted with the modelled geology. The originally supplied geological information depicted the main, central fold as a south-plunging anticline, but from modelling the geophysical data, it became clear that the overall plunge direction was a north-plunging syncline. Considering that a key aim was attempting to identify the basal contact of the ultramafics, this overall change in geological understanding had a major impact on the targeting strategy and any subsequent drillhole planning. Surfaces were remodelled, the geological model was attributed with optimised homogeneous properties, and the computed response was assessed. Comparison between observed and calculated improved, particularly where the syncline plunges towards the north.

James Reid – Principal Geophysicist with Mira Geoscience

James worked closely on the above project with Tim Chalke and Daniel Eden. He has extensive expertise in the planning and quantitative interpretation of electromagnetic and electrical methods, particularly the application of airborne electromagnetics to mineral exploration. He has broad experience in airborne, surface, and downhole geophysics, including survey design, data acquisition, processing, and interpretation using GOCAD, Geoscience Analyst, and the UBC and VP Suite inversion codes.

Latest news

Software tips
December, 07 2020

Automatic rotation

In Geoscience ANALYST you can autorotate viewport when presenting your 3D geoscientific data and models...
Read more
Software tips
May, 06 2021

K-means clustering

In Geoscience ANALYST Pro’s v3.3, you can quickly partition your data based on the K-means clustering...
Read more
Case studies
November, 17 2020

Using magnetic susceptibility measurements to define mineral exploration targets

Combining magnetic survey data with measured drillcore susceptibility data greatly increases the resolution and geometrical accuracy of the magnetic inversion...
Read more
Stratigraphic interpretation and modelling
March, 06 2020

Coal industry solutions

Our coal solution provides users the simplicity of 2D grid modelling with the geological complexity of 3D volumetric surface modelling...
Read more
Software releases
January, 15 2019

Geoscience INTEGRATOR AI for exploration

Geoscience INTEGRATOR, the missing AI link for exploration. This unique web-based data management system is designed...
Read more
About us
January, 10 2018

UDMN Award of Excellence

Geoscience INTEGRATOR wins - Last December, UDMN presented us with an Outstanding Achievement in Commercialization...
Read more
Software tips
June, 01 2021

Import geoh5 into GOCAD Mining Suite

Seamlessly go between GOCAD Mining Suite and Geoscience ANALYST...
Read more
Events
April, 19 2021

AEGC2021

Drop by our booth to say hi, discuss a potential consulting project, or discover what's new in our software...
Read more
Software tips
March, 01 2019

Create array property from scalar properties

This command, found in GOCAD's Property menu, creates a multi-dimensional array property from user-selected properties...
Read more
Software tips
November, 04 2019

Visualize structural measurements

In GOCAD you can visualize strike and dip measurements as tablets, discs, or orientation vectors by initializing Structural Graphics...
Read more
Q&As
April, 01 2019

Q&A Mineral Resources Tasmania

The construction of plausible geological models. 3D interpretation and modelling process is of a cyclical nature...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
May, 05 2021

3D seismic data and survey designer tools

Coming soon to Geoscience ANALYST, tools for hard rock seismic...
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services